You’ve probably heard of CoolSculpting, which is one of the numerous fat-reduction treatments available on the market. It’s advertised on the radio, television, and the Internet. It is also available at many medspa and cosmetic/plastic surgery clinics. However, as a more effective, safe, and economical alternative to CoolSculpting, one procedure is increasingly gaining popularity. Ultrasonic Fat Cavitation is the name of the method.
How Does CoolSculpting Remove Fat?
CoolSculpting eliminates fat by effectively “freezing” fat cells, causing them to collapse and die. Your body’s other cell mechanisms kick in to eliminate the dead fat cells after these fat cells die. Only particular parts of the body are FDA-approved for CoolSculpting: the chin/jawline area, thighs, belly, flanks, bra fat, back fat, underneath the buttocks, and upper arms.
How Does Ultrasonic Fat Cavitation Remove Fat?
Ultrasonic Fat Cavitation liquefies fat cells by using ultrasonic (high-frequency sound waves). The lymphatic system of your body then jumps at high speed to eliminate the melted, dead fat cells. The handpiece also helps to shape your target regions by “chiseling” and breaking down tissue to make you appear thinner.
We’ll compare and contrast the essential features of CoolSculpting and Ultrasonic Fat Cavitation below, and pick a clear winner for each:
Fewer Treatments To See Results? Winner: Ultrasonic Fat Cavitation
According to the CoolSculpting website, results can take anywhere from one to three months. It is because it requires a while for the fat cells to also be broken down and removed from your body using their exclusive freezing technology.
Ultrasonic Fat Cavitation, on the other hand, takes only a few days to work. The ultrasonic waves instantly liquefy fat cells, and your body’s lymphatic system swings at high speed to eliminate the dead fat cells.
Which is More Comfortable? Winner: Ultrasonic Fat Cavitation
The CoolSculpting website says:
“You may feel pulling, tugging, moderate pinching, extreme cold, tingling, stinging, aching, & cramping at the treatment site during the operation.” As the area becomes numb, these sensations fade. Temporary redness, swelling, blanching, bruising, stiffness, tingling, stinging, soreness, cramping, aching, itching, or skin sensitivity are common adverse effects after submental or submandibular area treatment, as well as a sensation of fullness in the back of the throat.”
Which Has Less Downtime? Winner: Ultrasonic Fat Cavitation
You can resume your normal routine immediately following Ultrasonic Fat Cavitation machine. There’s no need to take vacation days. Some of our customers even come in during their lunch hour! This is because the process is painless, soothing, and takes an hour or less to perform.
CoolSculpting, on the other hand, can have long-term negative effects. The following is taken directly from the website:
Rare side effects are possible. CoolSculpting® can produce a noticeable expansion in the treated area two to five months following treatment, which will require surgical intervention to rectify.
Which is More Popular? Winner: CoolSculpting
You can resume your normal routine immediately following Ultrasonic Fat Cavitation. There’s no need to take vacation days. Some of our customers even come in during their lunch hour! This is because the process is painless, soothing, and takes an hour or less to perform.
CoolSculpting, on the other hand, can have long-term negative effects. The following is taken directly from the website:
Rare side effects are possible. CoolSculpting® can produce a noticeable expansion in the treated area two to five months following treatment, which will require surgical intervention to rectify.
